Health insurance companies and managed care providers look very carefully at bills provided by doctors and healthcare providers. They have many reasons to challenge the amount of money billed by a doctor for the services provided. Some examples include: services were not a medical necessity; the level of care billed was higher than the level of care actually provided; or that the records were illegible.
If you are a medical provider and your bills are being challenged, this could have a very large financial impact on your business. Often these challenges are far in excess of $100,000.
Call us to learn how we can help you at 215-884-9300.
Insurance providers use many methods in order to try to not pay doctors what they are owed. It may be a technicality—such as no date on the record—or a more serious discrepancy, e.g., if the doctor does not lay out a specific plan of care for the patient.
These companies are allowed to use sampling methodology in their “overpayment recovery.” The insurance company often will extrapolate when coming to the amount of money that they believe is an overpayment. The insurance company uses a methodology to look at a small part of the bills and then decides what the actual overpayment is—based upon this extrapolation.
This methodology can be challenged successfully to reduce the amount of the alleged overpayment. Insurance companies also use incentive programs in order to try and have doctors reduce the care provided. These can also be challenged. Often the auditors who review these bills and these methods for insurance companies use flawed methods and analyses to come to their numbers.
Sometimes doctors will appeal these billing challenges on their own. But often it is a better idea to have an attorney experienced in dealing with managed care and health insurance companies to assist you.
For a law firm experienced in fighting the insurance companies on behalf of hard-working healthcare providers, please call us today at ThePhillyLawyers: 215-884-9300.
Sometimes the insurance company for patients injured in car accidents will institute a “peer review” under Act 6 of Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), which permits insurers to contract with peer review organizations (PRO). The insurer has 90 days from the date receiving the bill from the provider to submit a challenge to the PRO who assigns a reviewer to give their opinion about whether the services provided were reasonable and necessary.
There is also an opportunity for the provider to discuss the case with the reviewer. Then the reviewer issues a report within 30 days after its receipt of the medical record documentation. If the PRO gives their opinion that the services were not reasonable and necessary, then the insurer can refuse to pay for those services. The provider then can challenge with peer review with a reconsideration or appeal the decision in court. If the provider is successful in the challenge, the insurer must pay to the medical provider the outstanding amount plus interest at the rate of 12%, as well as the costs of the challenge and all attorney fees.
For a law firm experienced in fighting against unreasonable peer reviews, please contact ThePhillyLawyers.
ThePhillyLawyers can help guide you through the healthcare maze and help you with your battles. We can assist medical providers and patients with all of your healthcare reimbursement issues. We will present a well-researched, organized defense, to stop insurance companies from taking your money or withhold payment. Whether you are a provider or a patient, we can help.
Call us today at ThePhillyLawyers: 215-884-9300.
You are a gem in your profession.
Jack, Columbus, NJ